Maybe I should start driving a motorcycle.
Election Day is in
| Author | Comment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flastrohs |
||||||
|
$3.65.9 IN TOWN!
Maybe I should start driving a motorcycle. |
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
|
A barrel of crude oil his an all-time high today....over $120 a barrel. Can't afford to drive..............
|
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
|
SINGAPORE (AP) -- Oil futures hit an all-time high near $121 a barrel in Asian trade Tuesday on worries about threats to supply and a weakening of the U.S.
dollar. I heard that triple A predicts $3.90 a gallon by Memorial Day. |
||||||
mtlatc |
||||||
|
Flash...I don't want a whole new politics thread here...but didn't ya hear Nancy in 2006...Elect us Dems and we'll lower gas prices...L out FN L
|
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
mtlatc wrote: Yeah...they were really lowered. |
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
|
||||||
Spudder |
||||||
|
This is the only country in the world that is locking down its energy supply......fuck the Caribou!
|
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
|
By JOHN WILEN - AP Business Writer
NEW YORK(AP) Oil rose above $126 a barrel for the first time Friday, bringing its advance this week to nearly $10, as investors questioned whether a possible confrontation between the U.S. and Venezuela could cut exports from the OPEC member. Gas prices, meanwhile, rose above an average $3.67 a gallon at the pump, following oil's recent path higher. |
||||||
pillage |
||||||
|
The problem is the mass sprawl suburbia mindset of the past 20 or so years. The solution is becoming a less car reliant society and the vehicle to that reality
is sustainable development and transit.
|
||||||
barzilla |
||||||
|
The problem with that locally is that we have had a series of representatives and city officials that have resisted mass transit and have instead continued to
add lanes to the highways. This is why I-10, I-45, and HW 59 are under constant construction.
Check out my new blog at http://commons.chron.com/barzilla |
||||||
Phenomenal Smith |
||||||
|
Those officials are accurately gauging public opinion on mass transit.
I don't want to live in Houston. Fortunately, I work only 9 miles from I live. I have changed my driving habits so that I rarely go into Houston anymore (though I'll be at Rudyard's tomorrow to see Orange Is In.). |
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
pillage wrote: The "less car reliant society" is true, but when you're in sales and you have to go see the people, $4 a gallon gas is a killer. In my
situation, you can go without driving and live off of renewals, but you have nothing to deduct on your income taxes(for the self-employed). You get killed with
both halves of the social security tax....it's a no-win situation.
For a vast majority of us, living from day-to-day is becoming difficult. Middle income are being squeezed out. |
||||||
mtlatc |
||||||
barzilla wrote: Are the METRO buses still running in Houston...I always thought there should be a subway..then I did the research...not likely to happen. Would more have
to have an elevated.
|
||||||
barzilla |
||||||
|
Subway? Not a bad idea, whoops.....a slight flooding issue..... The buses run but they are unreliable. My wife has been an off and on user of public
transportation. She says that the light rail is quite enjoyable. The easiest solution is to use the HOV lanes and convert them into a mass transit train.
Check out my new blog at http://commons.chron.com/barzilla |
||||||
Spudder |
||||||
|
From this week's Barron's...
Why the Candidates Dodge Offshore Drilling By JIM MCTAGUE OUR THREE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES SHARE THIS PECULIAR infirmity: None of them has any backbone. If they did, then instead of blaming Big Oil for soaring energy prices, they would stand up to some real culprits responsible for the run-up. These are politically powerful coastal states like Florida, New Jersey and California, which time after time have placed their parochial interests ahead of the nation's critical need for energy independence by prohibiting the offshore production of natural gas and oil. Of course, oil companies have no electoral votes. And wealthy Californians, some of whom own property overlooking the oil-rich Santa Barbara Channel, are never slow to underwrite the costs of presidential campaigns. This might explain why in June 2007 all three presidential candidates were conveniently absent from the Senate when a vote came up on Virginia Sen. John Warner's proposal to allow drilling off the Virginia coast. It was roundly opposed by colleagues from New Jersey, Florida and California, on the nose-under-the-tent theory. There are an estimated 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas under the Outer Continental Shelf that technically is recoverable. The government says 54% of that energy is in the Gulf of Mexico and 31% is off Alaska. Florida alone, according to a 30-year-old energy survey, has an estimated 22 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 3.88 billion barrels of oil within 125 miles of its Gulf coastline. There's probably more, but Florida officials won't countenance a probing of the seabed within 125 miles of the state's coastline, citing environmental concerns. The fact is, drillers have an enviable safety record and arguably have done less damage to mother earth than have the construction and tourist industries on shore. The last significant spill from an oil rig in this country was off Santa Barbara in 1969, yet California has banned further drilling. Most major spills are a result of ship wrecks, yet no one proposes prohibiting seagoing vessels from sailing near shore. "If the other 49 states realized what Florida is doing to them, they'd be up in arms," grumbles Al Hubbard, an Indianapolis businessman who until recently had been President George Bush's economic adviser. Hubbard thinks the nation is crazy not to be tapping these supplies, especially when oil is trending toward $150 per barrel. "Why not keep the money here instead of sending it to the Middle East?" he asks. Republican Rep. John Peterson of Titusville, Pa., where the first oil well was drilled nearly 150 years ago, has tried tirelessly to lift the moratoriums on drilling off the East and West Coasts and the Florida Gulf Coast, and he will do so in coming weeks when Congress considers an appropriations measure for the Interior Department. His action largely will be symbolic, because of lack of support in the Senate and from the White House. For all his tough talk on energy independence, when it comes to standing up to these states the president also is without backbone. He favors limited drilling, as long as state and local leaders agree. PETERSON LAST YEAR INTRODUCED A BILL that would open up the Outer Continental Shelf to natural-gas drilling. That seemed like a reasonable idea, since there has never been a rig-related natural-gas environmental calamity, and the U.S. is paying the highest natural gas prices in the world. Just selling leases, Peterson says, would bring prices down immediately. But President Bush doesn't support revoking lease-sales moratoriums first imposed by his father in the 1990s and later extended to 2012 by Bill Clinton. "President Bush has made it clear that he will give great weight to the desires of states that do not want new oil and gas development off their coasts...," an energy department official wrote Peterson last December. Bush, during the 2000 presidential contest, promised his brother Jeb, Florida's governor at the time, that he'd maintain the drilling ban. It just so happened, we recall, that Florida and the U.S. Supreme Court gave him the election. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton want a windfall-profits tax on Big Oil. John McCain promises no more tax breaks for the oil men. These are feel-good proposals that fail to respond to the supply-demand imbalance that are driving up prices faster than our economy can fully digest them. Some experts now see oil hitting $200. At that level, the economy would stagger. Florida's tourist trade would be devastated. New Jersey's taxes would soar ever higher. The public would scream for succor. Perhaps then one of our candidates would grow a backbone. |
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
|
Up to $3.69.9 a gallon...in town. Out by the interstate it will probably be $3.79.9.
|
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
Spudder wrote: These prices are killing me. Our Government has failed us....+ too many folks driving large vehicles doesn't help either.
|
||||||
Spudder |
||||||
|
Strictly supply & demand issue.......if we're gonna prevent the oil companies from finding the stuff here, we deserve high prices.....everybody trashes
"big oil", "big pharma", "big insurance", etc......but what about "gargantuan government"?......at some point, high
gasoline prices will force adjustments in driving habits.....right now gasoline, as a percentage of household income, isn't as high as it was in the
'70s......cheap energy is not a birthright....
My Dad had a 40-year career with Shell Oil and always bitched about Americans who didn't appreciate the cheap gasoline here... |
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
|
$3.75.9/gallon in town. Diesel is approaching $4.50/gallon.
Memorial Day weekend should add another increase....$4 a gallon by then? |
||||||
Spudder |
||||||
|
I'm an investment advisor, and from all my info, I see oil going back to $100/bbl and gas to $3/gal by the Fall.......most energy companies are making long
term plans expecting no more than $60/bbl.....we are starting to see a slight reduction in consumption....just a modest adjustment in U.S. driving habits can
cut consumption by up to 10%, which would be huge. More folks will stay at home to eat, watch movies & sports, and continue to build their lives around the
neighborhood. I think the lower attendance at MMP reflects the fact that the people in the suburbs are opting out of a drive into the city (the Chronicle had
such a story this weekend).
In the '70s, I made my living selling insurance and drove about 25,000 miles per year....gasoline prices were nearly 10% of my income, even at 60-70 cents/gal. Now I office at home and drive 10,000 miles/year, if that. Gasoline is just 2% of my income now, so it's all relative. The price spike has been so rapid, though, that we have seen the price double in a hurry, that's the rub. I think "this too shall pass" and we will all begin to reduce discretionary driving and the price will fall some. |
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||
|
Price of crude...right now...$126.82 a barrel....up $2.70 today. Gasoline out by the interstate....$3.87.9 for regular unleaded. Four F'ing bucks a
gallon!!!!!!!!! It's depleting my depleted checking account........this is bullshit.
|
||||||
FatOldGuy |
||||||
Spudder wrote: Big Oil, Big Pharmaceuticals and Big Insurance are all sleeping with the slut Gargantuan Government, that's why.
Never confuse character with geography - - - Red Smith
|
||||||
barzilla |
||||||
|
Agreed. Plus, when you look at the windfall profits they are making it makes it hard to resist throwing the proverbial tomato.
Check out my new blog at http://commons.chron.com/barzilla |
||||||
Spudder |
||||||
FatOldGuy wrote: ...and dealing with the highest corporate income tax in the world.....35%.....& with other countries in the global economy encouraging investment and innovation, more and more US companies will simply "move offshore"....capital flows where it is least encumbered (i.e. taxed).....America's days of dominance are numbered if current trends continue.....emerging economies are not hindered by the restraints our government places on business....Brazil's stock market is up 50% in the last year and has had double digit growth for years.......Ireland is booming with a 15% flat tax..... The US pharmaceutical companies are the main reason life expectancies are 10 years longer since WW II.......US insurance companies have been mostly swallowed by European companies: ING, AXA, Allianz, etc. US oil companies are all eyeing overseas relocation (Exxon already moving a lot of their company to Dubai, BP is British, and Shell is Dutch). The US is on the verge of constructing a liberal ideal: total dependency on the state..... A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have....Barry Goldwater |
||||||
Spudder |
||||||
barzilla wrote: The oil companies would love to use their "profits" (why is that a dirty word???) to explore for oil.....THE FUCKING GOVERNMENT HAS PUT ALMOST ALL OF THIS COUNTRY'S RESOURCES OFF LIMITS! The government can tax the shit out of the oil companies...it won't get us one more drop of oil. We've been here before....Jimmy Carter......and it almost wrecked the country. You guys need to quit listening to liberal talking points and go take some economics classes. |
||||||
jb2k1 |
||||||
Big Oil, Big Pharmaceuticals and Big Insurance are all sleeping with the slut Gargantuan Government, that's why.Though it's kinda hard to tell just WHO the slut is, these days. But I DO know one thing -- we're getting it in the end! I've always wondered WHY are the big pharmaceuticals allowed to advertise to the hilt like they do here in the US? They obviously have a monopoly on the US market, with the government not looking favorably on foreign drugs coming into the country -- in the name of drug 'quality' and keeping an eye out for the consumer. And with every commercial for prescribed meds, they act as if the consumer will go to their doctors and request these meds as a 'gotta have' item added to their lives -- when nothing could be further from the truth. Doctors, and doctors ALONE, should receive information / advertising about the drugs. Without advertising bombarding the airwaves constantly -- how much lower would the drugs cost the public? ...without the pharmaceutical houses having to re-coup those costs?
Jimbob
Remembering '05 & wanting to go there again! ...and beyond! |
||||||
Spudder |
||||||
|
April 30, 2008
Start Drilling By Robert Samuelson WASHINGTON -- What to do about oil? First it went from $60 to $80 a barrel, then from $80 to $100 and now to $120. Perhaps we can persuade OPEC to raise production, as some senators suggest; but this seems unlikely. The truth is that we're almost powerless to influence today's prices. We are because we didn't take sensible actions 10 or 20 years ago. If we persist, we will be even worse off in a decade or two. The first thing to do: Start drilling. It may surprise Americans to discover that the United States is the third-largest oil producer, behind Saudi Arabia and Russia. We could be producing more, but Congress has put large areas of potential supply off-limits. These include the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and parts of Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. By government estimates, these areas may contain 25-30 billion barrels of oil (against about 30 billion of proven U.S. reserves today) and 80 trillion cubic feet or more of natural gas (compared with about 200 tcf of proven reserves). What keeps these areas closed are exaggerated environmental fears, strong prejudice against oil companies and sheer stupidity. Americans favor both "energy independence" and cheap fuel. They deplore imports -- who wants to pay foreigners? -- but oppose more production in the United States. Got it? The result is a "no-pain energy agenda that sounds appealing but has no basis in reality," writes Robert Bryce in "Gusher of Lies: The Dangerous Delusions of 'Energy Independence.'" Unsurprisingly, all three major presidential candidates tout "energy independence." This reflects either ignorance (unlikely) or pandering (probable). The United States now imports about 60 percent of its oil, up from 42 percent in 1990. We'll import lots more for the foreseeable future. The world uses 86 million barrels of oil a day, up from 67 mbd in 1990. The basic cause of exploding prices is that advancing demand has virtually exhausted the world's surplus production capacity, says analyst Douglas MacIntyre of the Energy Information Administration. The result: Any unexpected rise in demand or threat to supply triggers higher prices. The best we can do is to try to influence the global balance of supply and demand. Increase our supply. Restrain our demand. With luck, this might widen the worldwide surplus of production capacity. Producers would have less power to exact ever-higher prices, because there would be more competition among them to sell. OPEC loses some leverage; its members cheat. Congress took a small step last year by increasing fuel economy standards for new cars and light trucks from 25 to 35 miles per gallon by 2020. (And yes, we need a gradually rising fuel tax to create a strong market for more-efficient vehicles.) Increasing production also is important. Output from older fields, including Alaska's North Slope, is declining. Although production from restricted areas won't make the U.S. self-sufficient, it might stabilize output or even reduce imports. No one knows exactly what's in these areas, because the exploratory work is old. Estimates indicate that production from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge might equal almost 5 percent of present U.S. oil use. Members of Congress complain loudly about high oil profits ($40.6 billion for ExxonMobil last year) but frustrate those companies from using those profits to explore and produce in the United States. Getting access to oil elsewhere is increasingly difficult. Governments own three-quarters or more of proven reserves. Higher prices perversely discourage other countries from approving new projects. Flush with oil revenues, countries have less need to expand production. Undersupply and high prices then feed on each other. But it's hard for the United States to complain that other countries limit access to their reserves when we're doing the same. If higher U.S. production reduced world prices, other countries might expand production. What they couldn't get from prices they'd try to get from greater sales. On environmental grounds, the alternatives to more drilling are usually worse. Subsidies to ethanol made from corn have increased food prices and used scarce water, with few benefits. If oil is imported, it's vulnerable to tanker spills. By contrast, local production is probably safer. There were 4,000 platforms operating in the Gulf of Mexico when hurricanes Katrina and Rita hit. Despite extensive damage, there were no major spills, says Robbie Diamond of Securing America's Future Energy, an advocacy group. Perhaps oil prices will drop when some long-delayed projects begin production or if demand slackens. But the basic problem will remain. Though dependent on foreign oil, we might conceivably curb the power of foreign producers. But this is not a task of a month or a year. It is a task of decades; new production projects take that long. If we don't start now, our future dependence and its dangers will grow. Count on it. |
||||||
Flastrohs |
||||||