Quote:
Or Bush insisting that Iraq had WMD stockpiles and Cheney insisting on a 9-11 connection?


Good to see that you are in agreement that the report by its nature is biased. Progress.

Quote:
The Lancet survey was an actual ground survey of Iraqis. Its results are based on real data. Did your objective website include its conclusions as well?


The Lancet survey is kind of like the reporter describing a two man race by saying that the winner finished next to last and the loser came in second. A peace advocacy group goes to Iraq to document the destruction of war and they come back with a report that says the occupying force killed 10s of thousands. Surprised, hardly.

You are a math guy, you think numbers are by their nature pure in and of themselves. I can take numbers and make them do what I want by twisting the perspective as demonstrated in the example of the race above. So if something as simple as that can be twisted why do you think that a dead man laying on the ground can not have his cause of death twisted by someone whose purpose is agenda driven.

As far as the website that I go to in order to get information on Iraq being balanced, I think so, even your much revered Al Jazeera is posted there. Unlike you I attempt to get all sides of an issue and then sift through to get to what seems to make the most sense and contains the most credible information.