And in the same vein here's a somewhat analytic view of the pitching.  I agree that control is a big factor and maybe the "overall" value fully accounts for that, but in this case I ignored the scouting overall namber and factored the 3-pitch value (sum of fastball, changeup and the better of curve or slider) against control.  The way this was done may tend to overvalue control, but I agree with Bob in believing control is a huge factor.  Note that Hoyt only showed 2 pitches so his # can't really be compared directly to the others in this list.  Consideration for better computations will be given, but remember the output isn't going to be any better than the input.

Player Position MLB rank ETA D of B Fastball Curve Slider Change Control Overall 3 pitches X cntl
Mark Appel P 2 2015 1991.07.15 70 65 55 55 60 190 209
Brady Rodgers P 26 2015 1990.09.17 55 45 50 45 65 45 150 195
Joe Musgrove P 16 2017 1992.12.04 60 55 50 55 45 165 182
Kyle Smith P 18 2015 1992.09.10 50 60 50 55 45 160 176
Vincent Velasquez P 4 2016 1992.06.07 60 50 60 50 55 170 170
Michael Feliz P 5 2017 1993.06.28 65 55 50 50 55 170 170
Daniel Mengden P 22 2017 1993.02.19 55 45 50 45 50 45 150 150
Adrian Houser P 25 2017 1993.02.02 65 55 45 45 45 165 149
Asher Wojciechowski P 23 2015 1988.12.21 50 45 45 50 50 45 145 145
Lance McCullers P 10 2016 1993.10.02 65 65 45 40 50 175 140
Josh Hader P 9 2016 1994.04.07 60 45 50 45 50 155 140
Francis Marte P 21 2018 1995.11.24 60 40 40 50 45 45 150 135
James Hoyt P 24 1986.09.30 60 55 45 45 115 104