Quote:
Yeah, but we definitely won in spite of that decision, not because of it. I just think it's a little soon.


tt1stros, I actually like what Garner is doing. He is not making major changes to the lineup just because Ensberg is going to miss a few games. I mean obviously he has to play Lamb at 3rd base and bat someone 3rd not named Ensberg, but overall I have been pleased.

I think we can make due with what we got for now. Batting Luke Scott 3rd made sense at the time because Garner felt he could catch lightning in a bottle twice. I remember when Garner batted Chris Burke 3rd in the lineup one game and Burke responded with a 3-4 game, homerun, 2 doubles, and a walk.

Maybe Garner felt Luke Scott could do somethimg simular. :bow But whatever the case, like you say, it's a little soon.

It was only 1 bad game, but by winning the game it makes it a moot point to me. I mean, if we win tonight and Scott has another bad game, I might not even notice. :bump