Opening Day is in
| Astros Daily | Astros.com | 2010 Schedule | Minor League Talk | Baseball History Forum | MLB Standings | 25 Man Roster |
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
barzilla |
|||
|
In all fairness to the whole salary cap issue, while the Yankees have only won one World Series since 2000, they have been to the playoffs every except for
2008 since 1995. For crying out loud, Andy Pettitte is 18-9 in 40 post-season starts and Jeter is nearing 600 post-season at bats. It is getting ridiculous. On
the other hand, they must start inserting a salary floor if they are going to do that.
Check out my new Astros blog at kissmyastros.com
|
|||
cheo25 |
|||
barzilla wrote:I agree on the off-days for traveling. But the reason they wait three or four days or longer after series have ended is because it's already been lined up for TV and logistics have been settled. Part of the reason MLB awards home-field advantage for the World Series to the ASG winner is for competitive reasons, but the other part is to try to narrow down the number of cities that could possibly host the World Series for logistical reasons. I'm not saying it's right, but that's why it's done. Baseball was lucky in the old days that the LCS in both leagues usually went 6 or 7 games and that there wasn't much layoff in between series. |
|||
Phenomenal Smith |
|||
since 2000, they have been to the playoffs every except for 2008 since 1995. They went to 15 World Series from 1947-64. |
|||
Bobby the terrible |
|||
Phenomenal Smith wrote:Yeah and if my numbers are correct they have spent 1.9 billion dollars on player salaries since 00, so it really is shocking how they pulled all that off. |
|||
barzilla |
|||
|
Ah, right in my wheelhouse Smith. My first book touched on this. Player salaries may be huge now, but financial disparities were even wider back then in many
ways. The period of time you subscribe was right before the advent of the amateur draft. They had their pick of amateur talent before then so they could
dominate that way. Disparities overall are less now than then. Heck, the Phillies themselves averaged a 54-100 record between 1920 and 1940.
Check out my new Astros blog at kissmyastros.com
|
|||
Bob Hulsey |
|||
|
But you can't really compare those situations because MLB still had the reserve clause. Once you signed a player, they were essentially yours until you had
no further use for them. You could stockpile talent and the best teams often had the best scouts and the best budgets. That's still true for those
countries outside the scope of the June draft but that draft and the Rule V draft, along with free agency, have changed the equation.
Baseball had its haves and have nots then but it was a far different environment in terms of talent acquisition. Imagine if there was no draft and no salary cap at all in the NFL. The Cowboys would probably get their choice of the best players and the rest of the league would sign the leftovers while cheap teams like the Bengals and Rams would float close to bankruptcy because they wouldn't spend for the best players.
"We don't do anything easy. We're the Astros." - Craig Biggio
|
|||
Flastrohs |
|||
Bob Hulsey wrote:You are correct. The Cowboys would have the best players. They would be the Yankees of the NFL. But there is a salary cap and it's fairer to all of the teams. Anybody on here think most or all of the MLB experts won't pick the Yanks to make the playoffs in 2010? They'll be right back in it again in 2010, with the Red Sox challenging them. No wonder Blue Jay and Oriole fans quit going to their games. Teams have no chance. |
|||
barzilla |
|||
|
They have a chance like the Rays did, but the window of opportunity is much shorter. The Rays window started in 2008 and will close after this season when the
likes of Crawford and Upton go towards free agency. I like the Rays chances with their pitching staff, but it is an uphill climb. The Orioles are doing it the
right way. They will have their window from about 2011 to 2013. The Blue Jays will be able to do it when they shed themselves of the Vernon Wells contract. If
they can trade him and Halladay then they will be on that same road.
Check out my new Astros blog at kissmyastros.com
|
|||
RyanED |
|||
barzilla wrote:Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Roy Halladay is exactly what the Astros need, LOL. 17-10 with a 2.79 ERA last year. A mind-boggling and sensational 208-33 strikeout-to-walk ratio which was the best in baseball. The Phillies are one of the few teams who have several minor league prospects to trade for him, or they did prior to the Cliff Lee acquisition, and they were still unwilling to give up their top two pitching prospects which included Doug Drabek's son. Imagine a trio of Roy Halladay, Wandy Rodriguez and Roy Oswalt. All of a sudden Oswalt would become a number three starter. It would rival the Clemens, Pettitte and Oswalt trio that got the Astros to the 2005 World Series, in my opinion. I'd imagine the Blue Jays' general manager would want an offer of Hunter Pence, Bud Norris, Michel Bourn, Jordan Lyles, Jason Castro and Felipe Paulino just to get the ball rolling on a Roy Halladay to Houston trade discussion. And that's probably still not enough, but perhaps you can get them to include Vernon Wells. Oh well, it certainly is a nice thought to have while fantasizing. I obviously take the term "Fantasy Baseball" to another level. In all seriousness though, Carlos Lee's contract is really holding this team back. We're not even going to be able to make a run at hometown hero Carl Crawford this winter. It would have been nice to have the best outfield in all of baseball - Carl Crawford, Michael Bourn and Hunter Pence. That would have been tremendous, both offensively and defensively. Let's just hope Carlos Lee comes to training camp thirty or forty pounds lighter and in shape, ready to play hard. No more jogging to first base on grounders, and especially no more jogging to fly balls in the outfield!
|
|||
rdkapp |
|||
RyanED wrote: Can you say "PIPE DREAM" squared? |
|||
Clack |
|||
|
The Rays have an option ($10 M I think) on Crawford. They almost certainly will exercise the option. Crawford isn't likely to be a free agent this winter.
|
|||
barzilla |
|||
|
Reading over my post I realize I was unclear when I said this year. This year means 2010 and last year means 2009.
Check out my new Astros blog at kissmyastros.com
|
|||
RyanED |
|||
|
Clack, the Rays will almost certainly trade Carl Crawford this winter, as was first reported by Peter Gammons in early August. It will be a big shock if they
keep him. They wanted to deal both Crawford and Kazmir during the non-waiver trading deadline prior to July 31 but they were unable to do so.
I believe they already got rid of Kazmir near the waiver trading deadline ( traded to the Angels in late August ), and it won't be long before they free themselves of Crawford's contract. He'll probably traded in December.
|
|||
Clack |
|||
|
They still have to pick up his option, even if the Rays are intent on trading Crawford. That was my point....he won't be available as a free agent, even
though he is listed on the FA lists.
|
|||